"Bob Paddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lint would not like it. In this case there is no issue with that > usage, but I don't like relying on implied evaluations as they can > lead to very subtle bugs.
But implying a particular GCC version would automatically also use some specific avr-libc version is IMHO even worse. The ``politically correct'' way would be to use something like autoconf, and probe for the existance of <avr/version.h>. If it's missing, set __AVR_LIBC_VERSION__ to a low value (e.g. 1) from the command-line. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
