Vincent Trouilliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucky you ! Other than wanting to avoid all this in-line stuff, the > reason I replaced _delay_us(40) in my lcd routine, by an empty for > loop, is that I accidentally realised that _delay_us(40) produced a > 1,500us delay somehow !!! Couldn't figure out why, ...
Bug report #14224, has been resolved meanwhile. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
