Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> I have a feeling when all is said and done we will have the following
> distributions:
>
> excalibur-component.jar (container, component, logmanager)
> excalibur-datasource.jar
> excalibur-xml.jar (xpath, parser, xslt object, etc.)
> excalibur-url.jar (source, resource, etc.)
> excalibur-async.jar (monitor, event, etc.)

Don't forget clutil.

My two cents: if you have componentry which you are willing to split out
that does not have significant dependencies on any particular framework, it
will likely get greater visibility and usage if it is in either
jakarta-commons or xml-commons.

I do believe that people really want to reuse already coded and debugged
components.  It is when such components come with strings attached that the
hesitation begins.

- Sam Ruby


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to