> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I never argued against a testcase for containers.
I'm not saying you did. It is obvious that a testcase and ComponentValidator are not mutually exclusive and I do not know of anyone who have tried to frame it that way. My basic idea was to argue from the statement that contracts must be validated, and then show how a ComponentValidator complements the test case Peter saw as a solution. > This is one of my points, unfortunately Peter *will* not hear it. Maybe so. Given that this is as close to a flame fest that I've seen on avalon-dev, I'd rather wait for Peter's response or non-response. > Can I assume then that your are +1 on the matter? I am not a committer. /LS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
