On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:02, Paul Hammant wrote: > Peter, > > I'm not sure where you're leaving this Peter... Should I put mental > effort into doing some stuff to a) ConnectionManager as thought or b) > ServerSocketFactory as per my original email.
a) ;) > > Cheers, > > - Paul H > > >>>well most blocks should be using ConnectionManager and not worrying > >>> about getting ServerSockets themselves. I would consider any app that > >>> did that as one that is probaby building application at too raw a > >>> level. The only Block that should really have access to server socket > >>> factorys is ConnecttionManager. > >> > >>He he, I'm guilty of Cut and Paste development then. Take a look at > >>HelloWorld and bring it up to date? I'll copy that code around. > > > >eek. Looks like you do need to handle ServerSocket and friends. I guess I > >never got around to uploading the other layer. The other layer was > > basically inetd like. Essentially you just passed in name of service and > > factory for handlers. So HelloWorld looks up todate with whats in CVS - I > > was just thinking about something that I was playing with ages ago ;) -- Cheers, Pete *---------------------------------------------------------* | Programming today is a race between software engineers | | striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof | | programs,and the universe trying to produce bigger and | | better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. | | - Richard Cook | *---------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
