Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > Whats everyone think about renaming server.xml to environment.xml ?
Sounds reasonable to me. While we're on the subject of naming, what is *.xinfo supposed to achieve? Why not give it an XML suffix like all other files? Instead of myblock.xinfo we could name it myblock-info.xml or even myblock.xml. Then, there is (correct me if I'm wrong) some redundant information between the *.xinfo and the assembly.xml file. I know that *.xinfo is for the block and assembly.xml for the .sar application. But it seems to me that in every .sar application I write, there is kind of an aggregate of the various *.xinfo files in my assembly.xml. It would be nicer, if this aggregation of information would be done automatically or not at all. Ulrich -- Ulrich Mayring DENIC eG, Systementwicklung -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
