Hi, Sounds good but I have a few questions.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 05:04, Vincent Massol wrote: > * In the setEntityContext(), setSessionContext() and > setMessageDrivenContext() of the EJBs, we will retrieve the > ComponentManager from the JNDI tree and save it as a class variable of the > EJB. Similarly, it will be removed in the unsetXXXContext() (or ejbRemove() > for Session Beans and MessageDriven Beans) Why use static/class members and not use instance variables. Instance variables should work I think and IIRC using static variables will make your EJBs non-compliant and can be non-portable if you want to start doing some of the more fancy clustering stuff. > * EJBs that need configuration parameters will implement Configurable. Same > as for logging, the initialize() method will need to call a Config > component that returns a Configuration object. Im not sure this is ideal unless the EJB has large number of configurable options. I would hope/think that most containers have a simple graphical client where you can put config parameters into JNDI space. Would it be better to use that ? If there was large numbers of parameters then probably not but if there is only a small number of parameters ? Anyways I am only just getting into serious EJB work so ... ;) -- Cheers, Pete ----------------------------------------------- "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain ----------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>