On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:15, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> > > > What I propose is that a Configuration object is given the local XML
> > > > element name (no prefix) and only has the URI as namespace
> > > > information. The Namespace class could even be removed.
> > >
> > > This is an option.  We do want it to be clear that just because we
> > > support XML markup, that we do not support every aspect of it.  For
> > > example, the XML must be Structured--not semi-structured.
> >
> > Agree. This is also why I suggest prefix to be only a serialization
> > hint.
>
> When I applied the change, the name of the configuration element did not
> have the prefix information in it.  That is as it should be.

Just a warning but we decided opposite of this last time and this is a 
backwards incompatible change.

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

*------------------------------------------------*
| Trying is the first step to failure.           |
|   So never try, Lisa  - Homer Jay Simpson      |
*------------------------------------------------*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to