On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:35, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > It is much easier to just go > > > > getLogger().debug( .... ) > > > > Far more user/developer friendly. > > Totally. > > Ah, as a side note: why are you guys always suggesting doing > getLogger()? couldn't we make the logger variable of AbstractLoggable > protected so that extending classes already have access to it and avoid > making method calls to retrieve it? it's both easier and faster, but > maybe you guys thought of something I'm forgetting, thus my questions.
It is final so it will be inlined. Basically it is to avoid choosing the variable name between m_logger and logger. Some people hate m_ ;) -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
