> ugh. With a logging tool, you want as little exceptions as possible, as
> "not completely correct" behaviour of the logging toolkit in
> non-critical areas like this is ok.
You won't get the exception unless someone actually tries to use the
incorrect behavior. Or do you believe that silently accepting requests
without honoring them is OK? Define non-critical for a logging tool in a
server environment? Is the API intended to be public? What is the expected
behavior in an environment assembled from independent units if two people
attempt to use the the same resource, in this case a unicast listener?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
