Noel J. Bergman wrote:
a 1.1 release of LogKit (basically equivalent to CVS HEAD + update
to Log4J version, and adding a 1.1 tag) following by an immediate
cleanup of LogKit HEAD through removal of the deprecated content,
tag the update as 2.0 and relase under 2.0.
A little odd (in that v2.0 doesn't add anything, just removes), but do-able.
What was that expression - "less is more"?
Any plans to add support to LogKit v2 for such things as log rotationI personnaly would like to see effort focussed on a unified logging solution under which LogKit 2.0 is the last of the LogKit line and instead integration/synchronization with Log4J and others.
policies, etc., to all be dynamically reconfigurable?
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]