Noel J. Bergman wrote:

a 1.1 release of LogKit (basically equivalent to CVS HEAD + update
to Log4J version, and adding a 1.1 tag) following by an immediate
cleanup of LogKit HEAD through removal of the deprecated content,
tag the update as 2.0 and relase under 2.0.

A little odd (in that v2.0 doesn't add anything, just removes), but do-able.

What was that expression - "less is more"?

Any plans to add support to LogKit v2 for such things as log rotation
policies, etc., to all be dynamically reconfigurable?

I personnaly would like to see effort focussed on a unified logging solution under which LogKit 2.0 is the last of the LogKit line and instead integration/synchronization with Log4J and others.

Cheers, Steve.

--

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to