mcconnell 2003/01/29 09:31:10
Modified: sourceresolve/src/test/org/apache/excalibur/source
SourceResolverImplTestCase.java
Log:
Extended testcase to demonstrate conflict with ComponentSelector narrow.
Revision Changes Path
1.2 +7 -1
jakarta-avalon-excalibur/sourceresolve/src/test/org/apache/excalibur/source/SourceResolverImplTestCase.java
Index: SourceResolverImplTestCase.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/sourceresolve/src/test/org/apache/excalibur/source/SourceResolverImplTestCase.java,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- SourceResolverImplTestCase.java 29 Jan 2003 16:00:09 -0000 1.1
+++ SourceResolverImplTestCase.java 29 Jan 2003 17:31:09 -0000 1.2
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
//
final DefaultContext context = new DefaultContext();
- context.put( "context-root", new File( System.getProperty( "user.work" ) )
);
+ context.put( "context-root", new File( System.getProperty( "user.dir" ) ) );
resolver.contextualize( context );
//
@@ -67,12 +67,18 @@
final DefaultServiceManager manager = new DefaultServiceManager();
manager.put( SourceFactory.ROLE + "Selector", selector );
+ logger.debug( "Servicing the resolver based on the fortress pattern - this
will fail because the service implementation in SourceResolverImpl is attempting to
narrow the selector to a ComponentSelector instead of a ServiceSelector - something
needs to be changed here either in (a) the implementation or (b) this test case and in
Fortrress." );
+
+ resolver.service( manager );
+
//
// parameterize the resolver - Why?
// NOTE: Missing javadoc
//
resolver.parameterize( new Parameters() );
+
+ logger.debug( "resolver created - but is this correct ?" );
//
// setup a protocol handler - TO BE DONE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
