> > to generate the docs. I stripped testcases for everything but framework, > > phoenix & logkit. I figured it be good to keep some testcases in > > because, well, one should know we do have testcases. (BTW I seperated > > the targets out because it keeps the JVM within memory constraints.) > > I agree that people should know we have testcases, but I would prefer > to publish the reports generated by <junitreport> for that case. That > not only lets people know that we have testcases, but that the currently > released product has passed those testcases.
Agree completely. We should roll out Clover coverage too. < [...] > Although, the truth is that I would prefer bleeding edge stuff to not > be released on the web site because it is changing often, and it adds > extra management that we can't really keep up with. We should get CruiseControl results running somewhere. Thoughtworks is setting up a machine to host this type of stuff for open source projects. -ph __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
