Hi, On Tuesday 03 September 2013 16:01:30 Ralph Castain wrote: > I still don't see an issue with just detecting the version of automake being > used, and setting a conditional that indicates whether or not to use > explicitly include the subdir. Seems like a pretty trivial solution.
Ralph, sorry, we don't understand your proposal. The warnings will be generated at automake time. An AM_CONDITIONAL wont help us here. > On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:49 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Fabrício Zimmerer Murta <fabri...@familiamurta.org> wrote: > >> I think autotools has a concept of disallowing symlinks as it seems > >> symlinks can't be done in a portable way, and the goal of autotools is > >> making projects portable. > >> > >> Well, if the autotools user feels like using symlinks, then it must be > >> expected to break portability wherever you take your autoconfiscated > >> code to. A choice to the user. Maybe in the case, as the project is > >> bound to specific compilers, it would not be a problem to loose > >> portability a bit more by considering symbolic linking around.> > > Fair enough. > > > > We've been using sym links in the OMPI project for years in order to > > compile a series of .c files in 2 different ways. It's portable to all > > the places that we need/want it. Jeff, I think you mean the $(LN_S) loops for the PMPI interface. We will have a look into this. Thanks. - Bert > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Matthias Jurenz Technische Universität Dresden Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing (ZIH) 01062 Dresden, Germany Phone: +49 (351) 463-31945 Fax: +49 (351) 463-37773 E-Mail: matthias.jur...@tu-dresden.de
