On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:03:11PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > There's a lot of naysaying going on here, but don't assume that a single > properly built binary can't be made to run on a large number of systems > until you've looked into it carefully. All you have to do is target the > lowest common denominator, and statically link anything that isn't > compatible with all the target systems.
He already said that he isn't looking for one-size-fits-all solution. Providing different builds for every supported distro version may be cheaper than carefully looking into the single binary solution. But he also needs location independence. This could be solved by single binary or dlopen. Justin, just out of curiosity: Why do you want location independence? With kind regards, Baurzhan.
