Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-27 21:58: > On 01/27/2012 09:40 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-27 18:37: >> >>> Thanks for the link. What do you think of the workaround provided by the >>> attached patch? Good to go before 1.11.3? >> >> I haven't tested the patch, but if you ask me, I don't like "hiding" this >> in a SKIP. This is another case where a "local" XFAIL would be really >> nice. How impossible is it to introduce some kind of mechanism that a >> test can trigger when it has detected some condition that makes a future >> FAIL expected? >> > It's already there -- in master only, where we have TAP support.
Ok, good! >> Let me know if you still want me to test your patch. >> > Yes please, that would be appreciated. We can apply the patch to maint as > a band-aid, and switch to proper "localized XFAIL" once we merge to master > (extra kudos to anyone who volunteers to implement such a follow-up ;-). PASS on MinGW, SKIP on Cygwin. Good. Cheers, Peter
