Hi Stefano, Den 2011-09-03 09:41 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Saturday 03 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: >> >> [BIG SNIP] >> >> I don't think cccl is the future, I see it as the past. It's >> simply not needed when the needed bits are already in 'compile'. >> >> It's a bit sad to see all the effort going into writing private >> scripts wrapping cl into something that looks like gcc, when the >> effort could be spent making autotools just work instead. >> > For what concerns this: are you willing to re-submit your patch > series about AM_PROG_AR to automake-patches? I will try hard to > look into it, if you are willing to do the required testing and > to patiently explain to me the details I won't undertand (and > be warned that there will probably be many of them, since I'm a > total Windows noob). > > Oh, also, before doing that, could you please merge the 'maint' > branch into the 'msvc' branch? Or I can do that for you if you > prefer (but then you'll have to double-check that the merge has > been really successfull).
There was that little disagreement over how win32 portability warnings should be handled. That should perhaps be resolved first? Cheers, Peter
