Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > - For programs and libraries, automake now detects > EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES and > adds them to the normal list of dependencies, but without > overwriting the > foo_DEPENDENCIES variable, which is normally computed by automake.
Hmm, is there a convention about whether to use names like "EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES" vs. "foo_EXTRA_DEPENDENCIES"? I would have guessed the latter, as it seems more consistent (and a bit prettier)... -Miles -- Consult, v.i. To seek another's disapproval of a course already decided on.
