Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> wrote on 09/13/2009 12:09:31 PM:
> Hello Xochitl,
>
> * Xochitl Lunde wrote on Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:27:31PM CEST:
> > I have an embedded platform for which I override all the make rules by
> > writing the make rules by hand in Makefile.am. I have tested this
out,
> > and it works great, but because we have many unit tests, I have to
copy
> > and paste the rules over and over and over as we add unit tests.
>
> Ouch. Do you require GNU make or do you target portable make?
> If the former, then you should be able to use pattern rules.
>
> > And the very last thing, Automake 1.10 complains about the "$(shell
pwd)"
> > in my 'debugfile' definition in Makefile.am, but Automake 1.9.6
handles it
> > just fine. Which one is confused or how should I write this?
>
> That's due to (quoting automake/NEWS for 1.10):
>
> - `-Wportability' has finally been turned on by default for `gnu' and
> `gnits' strictness. This means, automake will complain about
%-rules
> or $(GNU Make functions) unless you switch to `foreign' strictness
or
> use `-Wno-portability'.
>
>
I have long since fixed the "$(shell pwd)" in my makefile, but I still get
it complaining
about '%' rules being a GNU make extension. I added "-Wno-portability" to
CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS, but
that did not change anything. What do I add -Wno-portability to?
How could I change this rule to not be a % rule?
%$(BIN_EXT) : %$(EXEEXT)
f=`echo "$<" | sed 's/$(EXEEXT)//'`; \
make $$f$(SYM_EXT); \
cp $< $$f-monimage$(EXEEXT);
$(OBJCOPY) -Obinary $< $$f$(ac_uncompress_ext)
$(ac_netos_imgcompress) $$f$(ac_uncompress_ext)
$$f$(ac_compress_ext)
$(ac_netos_boothdr) $(ac_netos_imgheader_cfg)
$$f$(ac_compress_ext) $@ $(PLATFORM) $(ac_netos_l2b_endian)
$(RM) $$f$(ac_compress_ext)
../../$(ac_netos_binpack) $(PLATFORM)
$(ac_netos_ldscripts)/rom.bin $@
mv rom.bin $@
mv rom.bin.md5 $...@.md5
