Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 01:34:50PM CEST: >> Switching to silent-rules feels like progress, so I want it to be >> enabled by default, at least for packages I maintain. Of course, >> that's my judgment, and if enough people say that my enabling >> silent-rules broke their XYZ, I can always change it back. > > I'm a bit undecided on the issue, with no great preference. Thus I > think I'll keep the argument to AM_SILENT_RULES undocumented for now > and let users fight this out when it spreads.
Fine by me. Silence ru13z! ;-)
