On 12/17/07, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > > Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > > The license update can simply be temporarily reverted back to v2 (with > > > FSF approval). > > > > I'd like to see that as well but I doubt it will happen. > > It's not politically feasible since official GNU projects are supposed > to reflect the GNU project's philosophies. I seem to recall that there > was a mandate that all official GNU projects were expected to use v3 for > any releases past some date (2007-07-31?) which means reverting to v2 is > not on the table. But I could be misremembering.
Why would they expect conformance to a policy that isn't yet ready? Also, what is the actual hold up? Where in the pipeline is the issue stagnating?
