Scott Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:44:40AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius did write:
>> IIRC, the argument had been that the libtool folks had wanted to "keep >> libtool outside of automake" because libtool is/had been supposed to be >> a tool independent of the make infrastructure being used (automake is >> just one of them). > As someone who is just getting started in the whole GNU autotools world, > I think "keeping libtool outside of automake" is one of the things that > make it difficult to learn GNU autotools. I like Ralf Wildenhues's > option #3 very much. As long as it's still available independent of Automake. I have no particular desire to use Automake for my projects. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
