After more research, I stumbled on: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/1999-11/msg00127.html
which recommeds %option prefix="foo" in the Lex file to add the prefix. This seems to be working. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:51:18 -0800, Svend Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to convert my program (http://cuetools.berlios.de) to use > automake and autoconf (my first attempt at using these tools). I am > having some difficulty because the code uses two sets of scanners and > parsers. > > Previously, my hand hacked Makefile had included the following lines: > > toc_scan.c: LFLAGS+= -Ptoc_yy > cue_scan.c: LFLAGS+= -Pcue_yy > toc_parse.c: YFLAGS+= -p toc_yy > cue_parse.c: YFLAGS+= -p cue_yy > > (these only work with gmake). I have read the automake manual > regarding Yacc and Lex support. So far, I have used the list of > recommended defines, and that has allowed me to remove the Yacc > command line prefixes in the Makefile. > > I am unsure what to do now regarding the Lex prefixes. The automake > manual seems to indicate that only Yacc requires the variable > prefixing hack, but I am getting variable redefined errors when I > don't use the Lex command line prefix. > > I have looked at the gdb source, which is recommeded by the automake > manual. However, gdb only seems to have one Lex file, so it only > helped me with the Yacc part. In addition, gdb seems to only use > autoconf, not automake. Again, this is my first attempt at using the > automake/autoconf tools, so I could be wrong about this. > > Do I have to find a list of symbol names used by Lex, and redefine > them to have a prefix? Is there any examples of packages that have > multiple Yacc _and_ Lex files that use autoconf/automake?
