On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > > >> PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not > >> understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the > >> reporter. > > I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org lists, because > > they tend to be unreliable. Not have done so in this case was just an > > oversight. > > otoh, when I do that, I usually get 2-3 complaints from people stating > that I shouldn't (ymmv).
Then there are these gray/white-listing wanna-be spam filters posters use :) My normal strategy in replying to lists is to CC:-ing the original senders on open lists (such as some *.gnu.org lists), while I am list- replying only on most closed lists. As open lists are an dying species nowadays, and are gradually being converted into spam breeding fields, I am getting used to miss CC:-ing the original sender ... ;) Ralf
