On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:28:29 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > I'm posting it here for comment. (In fact I'm mainly hoping > that some kind fellow will point out English mistakes...)
It is well written. > One of the output (here `data.c') is used as a witness of the run of > `foo'. Perhaps: "One of the output files (here `data.c')..." > The other files depend on that witness. Perhaps: "The other files depend upon that witness." > For this reason, it is often better to use another file > (not any output) as witness. Perhaps: "For this reason, it is often better to use a different file (not one of the output files) as the witness" > It is then renamed as `data.stamp' after `foo' has run Perhaps: "It is then renamed to `data.stamp' after `foo' has run" -- ES
