Am Mon, 2002-11-11 um 00.50 schrieb Earnie Boyd: > John Levon wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 01:01:08PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > >>>You could always just add -lstdc++ to the oprofiled_LDADD variable. > >> > >>This would be a fault, IMO. > > > > Why? Because linking c++ is more than adding -lstdc++. > > I do not think getting gcc to link -lstdc++ is a good idea either, but > > it doesn't have much more hack value than the solution you propose below > > IMHO. > > > > It's the hack that using g++ performs. ... no. Using g++ for linking performs other g++-internal tasks, such as composing ctors/dtors lists for static constructors and to pull in further (g++-internal) libraries into linking (cf. collect2 in newer gcc's).
What it exactly does is highly target- and gcc-version depending. It can boil down to "just adding -lstdc++", but in most cases it will perform more. Ralf
