>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Akim Demaille writes: >> And, as far as Automake goes, I don't think I'm making things worse >> to its non-users. Nothing changes for them. Peter> Possibly true, but try to keep a clean separation between Peter> Autoconf and Automake. Autoconf shouldn't have to know about Peter> removing files and such things. Just provide a list of files Peter> that you generate and then the makefile author/generator can Peter> decide what to do with it. I think we are in real disagreement here. I suppose it is because you are not the one who is pointed at when something is not appreciated in Autoconf, such as new files that need to be manually added to DISTCLEANFILES. What I'm doing now is buying my freedom. The freedom to extend Autoconf without 1. requiring from the rest of the world that they adjust their distclean rules, 2. requiring that Automake folks release a newer Automake etc., not to mention that it needs 1. writing documentation, 2. telling the people to read it. Something like --clean makes it transparent to everyone.
