>From the autobook: `_LIBADD': Like `_LDADD', but used for static libraries and not programs.
...and I want to create a dynamically library. Anyway, in either case the subsequent make fails and I get: when using "libgather_la_LIBADD = lib1/libgoodbye1.la lib2/libgoodbye2.la" make[2]: Entering directory `/offline/MyWork/Code/C/gnu_build_sys/src' rpath /tmp/k/lib lib1/libgoodbye1.la lib2/libgoodbye2.la make[2]: rpath: Command not found make[2]: [libgather.la] Error 127 (ignored) make[2]: Leaving directory `/offline/MyWork/Code/C/gnu_build_sys/src' When using "libgather_la_LDADD = lib1/libgoodbye1.lo lib2/libgoodbye2.lo" (and ignoring automake error) I get: make[2]: Entering directory `/offline/MyWork/Code/C/gnu_build_sys/src' rpath /tmp/k/lib make[2]: rpath: Command not found make[2]: [libgather.la] Error 127 (ignored) make[2]: Leaving directory `/offline/MyWork/Code/C/gnu_build_sys/src' > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-7] &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr; &Kgr;&agr;&rgr;&ugr;&pgr;&iacgr;&dgr;&eegr;&sfgr; (Alexandros Karypidis) wrote: > > I am trying to understand how convenience libriaries work. Using the dir > > structure "project/src/libX", where X is 1 & 2, I want to create 2 > > convenience libraries in project/src/lib1 & project/src/lib2, then merge > > them into a shared library in project/src. So I wrote the following 3 > > Makefile.am: > > > > in project/src/lib1: > > noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libgoodbye1.la > > libgoodbye1_la_SOURCES = goodbye1.c > > > > in project/src/lib2: > > noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libgoodbye2.la > > libgoodbye2_la_SOURCES = goodbye2.c > > > > in project/src: > > SUBDIRS = lib1 lib2 . > > lib_LTLIBRARIES = libgather.la > > libgather_la_LDADD = lib1/libgoodbye1.la lib2/libgoodbye2.ls > > > > The problem is that automake now complains with: > > > > "src/Makefile.am:4: use `libgather_la_LIBADD', not `libgather_la_LDADD'" > > So why not: > > libgather_la_LIBADD = lib1/libgoodbye1.la lib2/libgoodbye2.la > > Frank > > Francis James Franklin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and > wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again. > That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong. > --- Philip Roth
