>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> The aim of this patch and the next is to clarify the status of
Akim> variables: who owns them, and how their defined type (+=, := or
Akim> =) can change.
Akim> I end up with a rule which is somewhat unsatisfying:
Tom> Incidentally changes of this sort are ripe for test cases which
Tom> test expected behavior.
You're hitting the limits of my English :) I don't know if you say
``follow what the existing tests say'' or ``this is typically
something new tests should check''.
