On Mar 28, 2001, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> development utilities like libtool *expect* the .exe to *not* be
>> explicitly tagged in the Makefiles. having .exe breaks libtools
>> usage of scripts to wrap applications which need a loader hint
This is a correct assessment. Maybe libtool should give up on
creating wrapper scripts, and start linking replacement executables
with similar effects?
> Isn't there a _SCRIPTS primary _for scripts_. That doesn't get
> $(EXEEXT) added to it at all. Perhaps the wrong target was being
> used?
Nope. automake can't tell in advance whether libtool will decide to
link the executable in-place or create a wrapper script.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
