Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I mean, this check is _probably_ not necessary on a user system, since the > users will use well tested versions of Automake. But I don't have a strong > opinion. A fast and simple check should not be a big deal. > > Developers of Automake, however, should always be sure that such variables > are not left in the output. Ah, OK, I missed that point, thanks. Nonetheless, given that we can never be sure to what extend the test suite exercise Automake, I would include it anyway: better have automake dying than make. Just imagine ?SOME-CONDITION-RARELY-TRUE? %SOME-PARAM-WE-FORGOT%.
- Question marks in Makefile.in Pavel Roskin
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in akim
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Tom Tromey
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Pavel Roskin
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Lars J. Aas
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Pavel Roskin
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Pavel Roskin
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Tom Tromey
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Tom Tromey
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Akim Demaille
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in Tom Tromey