Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Akim> It is on purpose my uses of uniq have no &: it disables
> Akim> prototype checking.
>
> Do we really want prototypes? I seem to remember Perl experts telling
> me that they are confusing and weird.
You tell me! There is nothing in HACKING :)
I am not aware of the problems. I know they forbid things, but then
using & again fixes the issue (i.e., I'm not aware of problems which
require removing the prototype, adjusting the call is enough).
