On Feb 5, 2001, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to also work out a naming scheme for internally generated > targets. That way eventually it will be clear what people can rely on > and what they cannot. Suggestions here are welcome. How 'bout `_am-target-name'? (note the leading underscore) -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Pavel Roskin
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Akim Demaille
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Pavel Roskin
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Tom Tromey
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Pavel Roskin
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Tom Tromey
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Pavel Roskin
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Tom Tromey
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Akim Demaille
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Tom Tromey
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Akim Demaille
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Akim Demaille
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. Pavel Roskin