Raja R Harinath wrote:
> > I added a macro to test for the presence of etags and whether it
> > supports "--etags-include=<file>" or "-i <file>" for includes.
>
> If Exuberent etags is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for Emacs
> etags, it should support the same options. Otherwise, it is a bug in
> the distribution if it gives you a "non-standard" etags (you can call
> the Emacs etags the "standard").
Well, there is a precedent in the support for different compiler options and
I don't want to waste the time of potential CVS developers because they
couldn't get their TAGS file built. A lot of CVS users are installing on
RedHat Linux at the moment.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Were it left for me to decide whether we should have a government without
newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment
to prefer the latter.
- Thomas Jefferson
(appeared http://hotwired.lycos.com/special/lawsuit/ )
