Akim Demaille writes: > I'm all for the removal of this macro. > I'm for the removal of C's one too (there is none for C++ right?), but > here we are hitting the backward compatibility barrier. In fact, this > macro should move under GNU Make's responsibility, since it's probably > the only user. If I'm redefining the .c => .o pattern rule for my purposes (e.g., dependency generation) then I need to know whether the compiler supports -c -o, otherwise I have to do something like cc && mv. Please keep it. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
