Would those complaints be really due to "too many files" (ie. size issue) or
"too many files with questionable purpose"? The latter can always be fought
by being more clear about the purpose of all the files. In that sense,
having the symmetry of tools to handle both "make install" and "make
uninstall" would actually make the argument of including the tool for either
side more clear.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Tromey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 8:08 AM
To: Akim Demaille
Cc: Pavel Roskin; Tom Tromey; Peter Eisentraut; Assar Westerlund;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories?
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Honestly, I see no difference between plenty of small utilities
Akim> and one big. The difference is moot to me (Hm, I read that
Akim> somewhere, but I'm not sure I'm writing correct English :).
There's a difference to me. I get to hear complaints about how many
files automake requires.
Tom
