On 8 September 2014 23:51, Bastien Chevreux <b...@chevreux.org> wrote: > On 08 Sep 2014, at 22:30 , Marko Lindqvist <cazf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 September 2014 22:34, Bastien Chevreux <b...@chevreux.org> wrote: >>> Down Under there are mammals who got pretty good at imitating duck features >>> lately. >> >> That's exactly the reason for autoconf-way: >> […] > > OK, before this duck thing gets a bit out of hand, back to a more > day-to-day-like problem: >
I'm ginving theoretical autoconf-way answer. I admit that in some individual cases the Right Thing(tm) might be too much work in practice, and the "check version number" hack is justifiable. > I would need to test whether the compiler accepts “-OMG” Test if compiler accepts "-OMG" > AND > I would need a way to test whether the compiler is specifically GCC (not > clang, not icc) between 3.2.0 and 3.4.2 > > as I would need to disable -OMG on GCC version 3.2.0 to 3.4.2 because of user > report of miscompilations and/or buggy code there. Test if compiler miscompiles with "-OMG" - ML _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
