Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> writes: > Real "buildable by C89 or later" is rarely used, since due to lack of > long long you have no guaranteed 64bit integer type in C89.
Almost none of the software that I work on requires a 64-bit integer type. (C89 or later is also my default target for the software I write.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
