On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> wrote: > * Thomas Petazzoni wrote on Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:33:53AM CEST: >> So the ability of sharing the cache between execution of >> different configure scripts is a documented feature. Is it just that in >> reality it doesn't work that well ? > > You should be able to modify both configure scripts in a way so that it > works again; and in this particular example it should be done. Getting > this approach to scale can be a lot of work though.
But which one to change? Is it correct to assume that libglib/configure.ac is wrong because it assumes that when AC_CHECK_FUNCS succeeds not lib is needed, which, as in this case, is not true? oki, Steffen _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
