Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chm.duque...@gmail.com> writes: > I wonder if there are actually a lot of programmers who used the > autotools in IDEs and did not came back to classic text editors.
It's probably worth saying this explicitly, since Peter may or may not be aware of it: Emacs has nearly all of the features that one expects from an IDE, including keyword completion, integrated build, jumping to build errors, tag searching, debugger integration including stepping through code, and so forth. You can either use them or not as you choose, but the facilities are present if you want them. I suspect that's the most commonly-used IDE for Autoconf-using projects. Emacs of course also has an editing mode for Autoconf, although its automatic indentation support and syntax highlighting aren't that great. -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
