Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And yes, it sounds inconsistent. IMVHO the ac_cv_c_ prefix should be > changed to ac_cv_type_ here. What do others think?
The former expands to an actual type (e.g., 'unsigned char') whereas the latter expands to 'yes' or 'no'. So they're not quite the same, no? I suppose things could be handled more felicitously, but I don't see a bug in the current approach. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
