Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > autoconf-2.60b passed 'make check' with flying colors - see below. >> >> Thanks for checking this. >> > In other than test suite is autoconf-2.60b as good as autoconf-2.60 ? > (In test suite autoconf-2.60b is better than autoconf-2.60 :-) ). > > Can I consider it to be stable release and use it in everyday work ?
It's pretty good, yes; probably better than 2.60. It's not officially "stable", mostly because nobody has had the time to test it yet.
