* Bill Moseley wrote on Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:51:54PM CET:
> 
> Thanks -- I don't have any idea why that line is in there.  It may
> have been copied from a googled configure.in or maybe someone had a
> reason for using it at one point.  If we were under svn instead of cvs
> maybe svn blame would help figure that out... ;)

'svn blame' translates to 'cvs annotate'.  More precisely, it would be
the other way round.

Cheers,
Ralf


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to