Hi Paul, * Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:18:00AM CEST: > It's a good plan, except I think we'll need at least two alpha > releases. There are too many pending changes.
While I don't mind doing two alpha releases, wouldn't it be more sensible to postpone the alpha release until all those pending changes are applied? It's not too helpful if the feedback to the first goes like this: "foo doesn't work -- yes, we have a pending fix for this, will be in next alpha". OTOH if you meant that there will need to be two alphas after all pending changes are applied, then my humble opinion is: let the feedback to the first alpha show how things work out, and let's decide based on that. > (And I see I need to get my gnulib changes in soon... :-) Yes, that plan was also intended to convince and motivate ourselves to get things finished. ;-) Cheers, and thanks, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
