Stepan Kasal wrote:
> is it true that
>
> a= ; for f in $a; do ... done
>
> is not interpreted correctly by some shells?
There was some discussion on a related problem, on one of the
MinGW fora, a couple of months back. In a *Makefile*
LIST =
some-target:
for i in ${LIST}; \
do \
some commands; \
done
doesn't work; a possible workaround is to say
for i in ""${LIST};
But, that's a subtly different problem -- your example works fine
for me in bash, and in SunOS 5.5 sh.
Regards,
Keith.
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
