Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is clear to me the intention of the AC_FUNC_MALLOC in protecting > programs from non-conforming malloc() implementations.
By the way, malloc(0) returning a null pointer is perfectly conforming. It is just not what some programs want. -- I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by. --Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
