Roger Leigh wrote:

I'd rather avoid this complexity.  Isn't it easy enough to abort based
on the value of ac_cv_prog_cc_c89 (or whatever)?


Yes, but I didn't know if users were allowed access to those
internals.  I've reverted this (but kept it for internal use).

From a plain-old-user's point of view, I'd much rather see Roger's original version. I don't want to rely on undocumented autoconf internals any more than I have to. As soon as you release a version of autoconf with this macro set included and people start relying on these internal variables, you've just committed to never changing them in the future.



_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to