On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:54:15AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> just seen far too many postings on various lists where
> people downloaded a package (all packages built with the autotools) and
> ran into problems when _not_ using GNU make.
FWIW, it's clear to me from reading the Automake list that
portability of Automake-generated Makefiles is very important to
that tool's maintainers. So the above assertion is quite
surprising, and if it's accurate, I'm sure the Automake folks
would find it rather alarming.
> So the OP's question implied that his make program was not able to
> handle autoconf's Makefile... does this mean that autoconf is at fault here?
Well, I rather doubt that OpenBSD "make" is intentionally
unsupported; thus, the observed behaviour would indeed seem to be
a bug. Whether the bug is in one of Autoconf's Makefile.am's, or
in Automake's processing of a correct Makefile.am, I wouldn't
know.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
It must be said that they would have sounded better if the singer
wouldn't throw his fellow band members to the ground and toss the
drum kit around during songs.
- Patrick Lenneau
