"Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > changes were made to autoconf > > What changes are you talking about, exactly? > > > which made it incompatible with known, widely-used versions of Bourne shell > > Which versions of the Bourne shell are you talking about here, exactly? > > I'd refer back to the mailing list archive from early last year,
That's pretty vague. I tried finding the discussion that you're referring to by searching for "Bourne AND Dickey" in both the autoconf and bug-autoconf archives. I didn't find anything (other than the current discussion). If you can supply a URL then I can investigate whether such a bug still exists in the current version of Autoconf.
