> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:48:30 +0100
> From: Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> your point is quite fine - why not let the lines
> go into the makefile instead of config.status. I just wonder how to
> do this - if it would be possible then it would be faaaar better
> since `make` can take of the dependencies.

Since it's a make rule, I would put this sort of thing into Automake
rather than into Autoconf.  You can look at how Automake does things,
for ideas about how to implement it.

Reply via email to