> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:48:30 +0100 > From: Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> your point is quite fine - why not let the lines > go into the makefile instead of config.status. I just wonder how to > do this - if it would be possible then it would be faaaar better > since `make` can take of the dependencies. Since it's a make rule, I would put this sort of thing into Automake rather than into Autoconf. You can look at how Automake does things, for ideas about how to implement it.